Apart from the list revision, no parties were present. The court found compliance or lack of interest, leading to dismissal and liberty to revive.
Contempt application dismissed; liberty granted to file an application for revival.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6811 of 2014
Applicant :- Chetram Dattak Opposite Party :- Rakesh Shankar S.P. Jalaun And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Irfan U Huda,Mrs. Nuzhat Parveen
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the parties.
From perusal of the record, it appears that either the order of the this Court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed.
However, in case, any cause of action still survives in the present application, the applicant/applicants shall be at liberty to file application for revival of the present application. Order Date :- 16.8.2022 Pramod Tripathi
Digitally signed by PRAMOD TRIPATHI Date: 2022.08.17 14:26:23 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Chetram Dattak
Rakesh Shankar S.P. Jalaun
Other
Prakash Padia
Pramod Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
