The court held a contempt application infructuous as the opposite party had complied with the underlying writ court order by reinstating the applicant in service.
The contempt application was dismissed as infructuous; the contempt notice was discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4774 of 2022
Applicant :- Hrishikesh Pandey Opposite Party :- Sri Avinash Padneys.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Siddharth Khare
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Affidavit of compliance filed today is taken on record.
Sri I.B. Singh, learned Standing Counsel, states that the applicant has been reinstated in service pursuant to the order of writ Court dated 30.07.2021 and has also joined the services on 14.10.2022, copy of reinstatement order as well as joining has been brought on record as annexure Nos. 1 and 2 to the affidavit.
In view of the said fact as the order of writ Court has been complied by the opposite party, present contempt application is rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
Contempt notice stands discharged.
File consign to record.
Order Date :- 18.10.2022 Shekhar
Digitally signed by SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY Date: 2022.10.18 17:10:25 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Hrishikesh Pandey
Sri Avinash Padneys P.
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Shashi Shekhar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
