Vijay Shankar Pandey v. Sri Hari Pratap Shahi Nagar Aykut Varanasi Nagar Nigam
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. -…
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3864 of 2016
Applicant :- Vijay Shankar Pandey Opposite Party :- Sri Hari Pratap Shahi Nagar Aykut Varanasi Nagar Nigam Counsel for Applicant :- Nand Kishore Singh,Rahul Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Bipin Bihari Pandey,Vivek Verma
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised. Nobody is present on behalf applicant whereas Shri Bipin Bihari Pandey, learned counsel is present on behalf of opposite party.
It is submitted by Shri Bipin Bihari Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party that the writ court order has already been complied with and the present petition has now become infructuous.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 21.7.2022 Swati
Digitally signed by SWATI PATHAK Date: 2022.07.25 10:32:39 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Shankar Pandey
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court