The applicant sought directions to initiate contempt proceedings for non-compliance. The court found compliance or loss of interest, dismissing the application as needless to keep pending while permitting revival if relief survives.
The contempt application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3384 of 2016
Applicant :- Rohit Garg Opposite Party :- Raj Pal Singh Counsel for Applicant :- Prem Chand Jain Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.,Dinesh Kumar Maurya,Kamala Shanker Yadav
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the applicant whereas learned Standing Counsel is present for the State-respondent.
The applicant is before this Court for a direction to initiate contempt proceedings against the opposite party for wilful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 09.10.2015 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 57982 of 2015.
From perusal of the record, it appears that either the order of the writ Court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed.
However, in case, any relief still survives in the present application, the applicant shall be at liberty to file application for revival of the present application.
Order Date :- 21.7.2022
Swati
Digitally signed by SWATI PATHAK Date: 2022.07.25 10:36:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rohit Garg
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
