A contempt application was dismissed because the applicant was absent and the filing party determined that the order had been complied with or the parties lost interest in proceeding.
The contempt application was dismissed. The applicant is allowed to file for recall within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2214 of 2015
Applicant :- Neeraj Kumar And Anr. Opposite Party :- Deepak Singhal Grah Sachiv U.P. Lko. And 6 Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Neeraj Kumarin Parson,Arun Kumar (In Person)
Counsel for Opposite Party :- D.K. Mishra
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the applicant though learned Standing Counsel is present.
From perusal of the record, it is clear that either the order of this court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest to proceed with the matter.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
Accordingly, the present contempt is dismissed.
Since nobody is present on behalf of the applicant, it is open to the applicant to file application for recall of this order within two months, in case the matter is still survive.
Order Date :- 15.9.2022 saqlain
Digitally signed by SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER Date: 2022.09.19 13:41:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Neeraj Kumar And Anr.
Deepak Singhal Grah Sachiv U.P. Lko. And 6 Ors.
Prakash Padia
Syed Mohammad Saqlain Haider
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
