The applicant in a contempt application was absent despite the list being revised. The court, noting non-appearance and lack of compliance evidence, dismissed the application with liberty to recall.
Application dismissed with liberty to file recall within two months without affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2189 of 2015
Applicant :- Ram Krishna Niranjan Opposite Party :- Sri Sarvendra Vikram Singh Director S.C.E.R.E.T. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the applicant though learned Standing Counsel is present.
From perusal of the record, it is clear that either the order of this court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest to proceed with the matter.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
Accordingly, the present contempt is dismissed with liberty to file application for recall of this order within two months in case matter still survives if such an application is filed it need not be accompanied by any affidavit.
Order Date :- 14.9.2022 saqlain
Digitally signed by SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER Date: 2022.09.17 12:49:49 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Krishna Niranjan
Sri Sarvendra Vikram Singh
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
