In the absence of any party, the court dismissed the contempt application as it appeared the impugned order was complied with or parties lost interest, allowing appeal within two months.
Contempt application dismissed; applicant allowed to recall order within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2082 of 2015
Applicant :- Dwarikesh Prasad Mishra Opposite Party :- Shri Komal Singh Yadav D.I.O.S. Alld. Counsel for Applicant :- Vineet Sanklp
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised. Nobody is present.
From perusal of the record, it appears that either the order of the writ Court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed.
Since, nobody is present on behalf of applicant, it is open to the applicant to file application for recall of this order within two months in case matter still survives.
Order Date :- 14.9.2022 Swati
Digitally signed by SWATI PATHAK Date: 2022.09.20 10:05:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application should be dismissed due to non-appearance and possible compliance of the writ order.
Dwarikesh Prasad Mishra
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
