Anil v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Allahabad High Court addressed a second bail application. The Court refused to consider applicant's case on merits while the trial proceeded, to avoid prejudicing the lower court's independent evidence assessment. Bail was rejected, but the trial was directed to conclude within six months.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; trial directed to conclude within six months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34254 of 2021
Applicant :- Anil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Satendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
This is second bail application. The first bail application was rejected by me on merits vide order dated 17.12.2020.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This application has been filed seeking prayer for bail on behalf of applicant- Anil, involved, in Case Crime No. 214 of 2019, under Section 306 IPC, P.S. Bewar, District- Mainpuri.
Learned counsel for the applicant has fairly submitted that the trial in the present case has already started and the statements of as many as three prosecution witnesses have already been recorded. He has tried to refer to the prosecution evidence given during trial in order to show that the case for bail is made out. The period of detention of the applicant has also been pointed out.
Learned AGA for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant at the stage when the trial was already in progress.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anil
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Rajiv Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/34254/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court