The Allahabad High Court allowed a bail application by an order citing a previous similar order in another bail application.
Application allowed for the reasons demonstrated in the referenced order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1912 of 2022
Applicant :- Satish Gupta And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Kumar Tripathi,Sarvanand Pandey,Subhash Chandra Pandey,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Allowed.
For order, see order of date passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.729 of 2022 (Rashid vs. State of U.P.)
Order Date :- 8.3.2022 Ashok Gupta
Digitally signed by ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA Date: 2022.03.09 18:39:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rashid vs. State of U.P.Referred¶6
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.729 of 2022
Satish Gupta And Another
Subhash Chandra Sharma
Ashok Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
