Allowed

Sintu Singh @ Sachindra Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC7 Mar 2022BAIL/1170/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed by an accused charged under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The court held that the applicant had made out a prima facie case for bail and granted release subject to standard conditions and a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant Sintu Singh on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount of PC.

Sintu Singh @ Sachindra Singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1170 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Sintu Singh @ Sachindra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Kumar Singh,Satyawan Shahi

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to gang chart, only one case had been shown against accused-applicant and in which he is on bail. There is criminal history of four other cases against him, in which he is also on bail. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that a case under Section 25 of Arms Act was also registered by the police subsequent to this incident, in which he is also on bail. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 7.10.2021 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant- Sintu Singh @ Sachindra Singh, involved in Case Crime No. 152 of 2021, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Belghat, District - Gorakhpur, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:

¶11

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶12

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶13

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. 4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶14

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶16

Order Date :- 7.3.2022 Kamarjahan

¶17

Digitally signed by KAMARJAHAN ANSARI Date: 2022.03.08 13:18:59 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sintu Singh @ Sachindra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sintu Singh @ Sachindra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Firoz @ Machchhad Vs State of U.P.

Rahamtullah @ Daddu Vs State of U.P.

Manish Vs State of U.P.

Karu @ Ajay Pal Vs State of U.P.

Ganthe Alias Salim Vs State of U.P Thru Secretary Home Lknw.

Kalyan Singh @ Kalyandas Vs State of U.P.