Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8829 of 2021
Applicant :- Ravendra Singh Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Nitish Kumar Pandey,Onkar Nath
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None for applicant.
Learned A.G.A. is present.
On previous dates also, no one present on behalf of applicant to press this application for anticipatory bail. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the instant application for anticipatory bail.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 6.9.2022 CS/-
Digitally signed by CHANDAN SINGH Date: 2022.09.08 10:43:45 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravendra Singh Yadav
State of U.P.
Raj Beer Singh
Chandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
