Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by Umesh Babu and others was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on either the previous dates or on the current date to press the application.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8649 of 2021
Applicant :- Umesh Babu And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kamal Dev Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None for applicants.
Learned A.G.A. is present.
On previous dates also, no one present on behalf of applicants to press this application for anticipatory bail. It appears that applicants are not interested in pursuing the instant application for anticipatory bail.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 6.9.2022 CS/-
Digitally signed by CHANDAN SINGH Date: 2022.09.08 10:43:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Umesh Babu And 2 Others
Raj Beer Singh
Chandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
