Application for anticipatory bail was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear before the court to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15521 of 2021
Applicant :- Aishwarya Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Raghuvansh Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None for the applicant.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
From perusal of order-sheet it appears that on previous date also no one has appeared on behalf of applicant to press the instant application for anticipatory bail. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 5.9.2022 Ashish
Digitally signed by ASHISH Date: 2022.09.08 17:49:52 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aishwarya Singh
State Of U.P.
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
