Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous based on the applicant counsel's submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8983 of 2022
Applicant :- Ragib Rana Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sumit Daga Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Akhilesh Kumar Pandey,Sunil Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Sri Sunil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Ram Prakash Patel, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Sri Sumit Daga, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application has now become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the statement so made, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
The certified copy of the orders and other relevant documents shall be returned to the counsel for the applicant after obtaining photostat copies, which shall be kept on record.
Order Date :- 12.10.2022 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.10.13 10:31:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ragib Rana
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
