Virendra v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 680 of 2020
Applicant :- Virendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Kant Bharadwaj Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ankit Saran
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of applicant. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This application for anticipatory bail is pending since last two years.
The instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 9.9.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.09.10 10:25:12 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Virendra
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/680/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court