The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution after the case had been pending for approximately one year. Any interim order remains vacated.
Application dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1508 of 2021
Applicant :- Amit And 11 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Chandra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of applicants. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This application for anticipatory bail is pending since last one year.
The instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.9.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.09.09 09:42:50 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Amit And 11 Others
Raj Beer Singh
Neeraj Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
