Saddam v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant had not appeared for a year.
The application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant had not appeared for a year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 874 of 2021
Applicant :- Saddam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ansar Ahmad
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of applicant. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This application for anticipatory bail is pending since last one year.
The instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.9.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.09.09 09:42:46 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Saddam
State of U.P.
Raj Beer Singh
Neeraj Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court