Kajim v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous on the grounds that the applicant had already been arrested.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous on the grounds that the applicant had already been arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6106 of 2022
Applicant :- Kajim Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Rai,Om Prakash Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Roshan Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Sri Om Prakash Rai, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous as applicant has already been arrested.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 3.8.2022 A. Tripathi
Digitally signed by AKHILESH TRIPATHI Date: 2022.08.03 17:15:05 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kajim
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court