Mehul Kumari v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as the applicant failed to appear on previous dates showing lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
What did the court decide?
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
Court No. - 75 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15327 of 2021 Applicant :- Mehul Kumari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sandeep Kumar Yadav,Vipin Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None for the applicant.
Learned AGA is present.
On previous dates also, no one has appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 3.8.2022 Vik/-
Digitally signed by VIKRAM GUPTA Date: 2022.08.04 15:19:39 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mehul Kumari
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/15327/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court