This order dismisses an anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicants on the hearing date or on a previous date.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1673 of 2020
Applicant :- Dheeraj And 3 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None for the applicants. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
On previous date also, no one has appeared on behalf of the applicants. It appears that applicants are not interested in pursuing this application for anticipatory bail.
In view of the aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 2.8.2022 Puspendra
Digitally signed by PUSPENDRA NARAYAN SINGH Date: 2022.08.04 10:35:50 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dheeraj And 3 Ors
Raj Beer Singh
Puspendra Narayan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
