Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicants did not appear or express interest in pursuing the matter.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4796 of 2020
Applicant :- Muneem And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Irshad Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of applicants. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
On previous date also, no-one has appeared on behalf of applicants. It appears that applicants are not interested in pursuing the instant application.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.8.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.08.08 16:43:44 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Muneem And Another
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
