Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous because a final report had been submitted in the concerned court. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4539 of 2022
Applicant :- Pashupati Shah Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Surendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Shri Surendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned A.G.A. submits that Final Report has been submitted in the court concerned in the present matter and due to the aforesaid reason, the application has become infructuous.
In view of above, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 2.6.2022 T. Sinha
Digitally signed by TRIPTI SINHA Date: 2022.06.03 11:23:03 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pashupati Shah
State Of U.P
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
