Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. set at Court No. 91 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2907 of 2022
Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Dubey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
List revised.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application. Even previously on 25.7.2022 the matter was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the applicant which was noted in the order.
Sri Ankit Srivastava, learned counsel for the State is present.
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Order Date :- 18.8.2022 Naresh
Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR Date: 2022.08.18 18:10:45 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Kumar Dubey
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
