The single judge court dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on the ground that the application had become infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10575 of 2021
Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Priyavrat Tripathi,Avanish Kumar Srivastava,Sarvanand Pandey,Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Heard Sri Som Nath Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Avanish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ankit Srivastava, learned State counsel.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been arrested and sent to jail and as such the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Order Date :- 18.8.2022 Naresh
Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR Date: 2022.08.18 18:11:16 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be dismissed as it has become infructuous due to the applicant's arrest.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Kumar
State of U.P.
Samit Gopal
Naresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
