Allowed

Sandeep Kumar Sonkar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Aug 2022A482/674/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of proceedings in a matrimonial dispute involving Section 498-A IPC. The Court, relying on a successful mediation report showing an amicable settlement and agreement to withdraw cases between the parties, allowed the prayer and quashed the FIR, charge sheet, and cognizance order.

What did the court decide?

The entire proceedings of the case, including the charge sheet dated 23.7.2018 and cognizance order dated 3.3.2020, are hereby quashed.

Sandeep Kumar Sonkar and Another Vs State of U.P… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 91

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 674 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Sonkar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sharad Saran Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶5

List revised.

¶6

No one appears on behalf of the applicants to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Sri Ankit Srivastava, learned counsel for the State is present.

¶7

The matter is thus being decided finally on the basis of records with the assistance of learned State Counsel.

¶8

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the charge sheet dated 23.7.2018, cognizance order dated 3.3.2020 as well as entire proceedings of Case No. 1284 of 2020, State vs. Sandeep Kumar Sonkar and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 115 of 2018, under Section 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, 1961, Police Station Saini, District- Kaushambi, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaushambi, and with the further prayer to stay the further proceedings of aforesaid case, during the pendency of present application.

¶9

The matter was referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court vide order dated 12.1.2021 for making an effort between the parties for settling their disputes amicably.

¶10

As per report of Mediation Centre dated 6.5.2022 the parties have amicably settled their dispute and further agreed to withdraw the cases going on between them.

¶11

As per the office report dated 17.8.2022, a report from the Mediation Centre of this Court is on record which states that mediation between the parties is successful.

¶12

From perusal of the report of Mediation Centre of this Court, it appears that in pursuance of the said order the mediation proceedings were taken up which ended in a settlement dated 6.5.2022 between the parties and the Mediation succeeded. The parties have settled their grievances and even the dispute arising

¶13

in the present matter. The parties have agreed to withdraw the cases going on between them, the said fact is mentioned in para- 7 (e) of the said mediation report.

¶14

The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed.

¶15

From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the proceedings as prayed for by the applicant(s).

¶16

The present application is allowed.

¶17

The entire proceedings of the aforesaid case as well as charge sheet and cognizance order in the aforesaid case are hereby quashed.

¶18

Office is directed to communicate this order to the concerned court within two weeks from today.

¶19

(Samit Gopal,J.)

¶20

Order Date :- 17.8.2022 Naresh

¶21

Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR Date: 2022.08.18 18:06:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sandeep Kumar Sonkar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Kumar Sonkar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarthak Goel Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ghanshyam Jaiswal Vs State of U.P. and Another

Gyan Chandra and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vibhor Mehrotra and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shakti Gupta and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Firoj Ahamad and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another