The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear on the date of hearing and had no interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15826 of 2021
Applicant :- Amir And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Irshad Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None appears for the applicants.
On previous date also no one has appeared on behalf of applicants.
It appears that applicants are not interested in pursuing this application for anticipatory bail.
Hence, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 4.8.2022 AKT
Digitally signed by ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI Date: 2022.08.05 15:55:39 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Amir And 3 Others
Raj Beer Singh J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
