Disposed

Yashpal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC4 Nov 2022ABAIL/10330/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Court No. 78 disposed of an anticipatory bail application by accepting the counsel's prayer to dismiss it as withdrawn, subject to the applicant surrendering within four weeks. The court directed that any subsequent regular bail application be decided in accordance with Satender Kumar Antil guidelines and stayed coercive action until surrender or the four-week period expired.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; applicant directed to surrender within four weeks; regular bail pending; no coercive action allowed.

Yashpal Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10330 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Yashpal Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Sahani Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Pawan Kumar Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pramod Kumar Sahani, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Vibhav Anand Singh, learned A.G.A. for State and also perused the material available on record.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 612 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 436, 427 I.P.C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act and Section 3/4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, P.S.- Cantt., District- Gorakhpur.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within a period of four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 4.11.2022 Siddhant

¶13

Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SAHU Date: 2022.11.05 13:38:41 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Yashpal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yashpal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Farman Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jagdish Prasad Gautam and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Virendra Singh and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Naresh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Shakuntala Vs State of U.P and Another

Urmila Devi Vs State of U.P.