The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous by the learned counsel itself, holding that the proceeding had become unnecessary.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10435 of 2022
Applicant :- Naresh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Yatish Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Saumya Srivastava
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Sri Yatish Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application has now become infructuous.
In view of the statement so made, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
The certified copy of the orders and other relevant documents shall be returned to the counsel for the applicant after obtaining photostat copies, which shall be kept on record.
Order Date :- 4.11.2022 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.11.04 17:21:44 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Naresh
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
