Disposed

Virendra Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC3 Nov 2022ABAIL/10040/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application. The applicants withdrew the plea with liberty to file a regular bail application based on Supreme Court guidelines. The court directed surrender within one month and stayed coercive action.

What did the court decide?

Applicants directed to surrender within one month; no coercive action during this period; liberty to file regular bail.

Virendra Singh and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10040 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Virendra Singh And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Pandey,Shalini Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for applicants as well as Sri V.K. Gupta, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.115 of 2021, under Sections 452, 323, 506 and 308 I.P.C., P.S. Jahanganj, District Farrukhabad.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Virendra Singh, Satendra Singh, Lala Singh, Kamal Singh, in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 3.11.2022 Ravi Kant

¶13

Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.11.03 16:41:22 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Virendra Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virendra Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guddu @ Naushad and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Jai Shri Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rampal Singh Vs State of U.P.

Farman Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jagdish Prasad Gautam and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mobeen Vs State of U.P. and Another