Single judge court dismissed bail application under Section 482 CrPC. It refused to decide substantive merits, directing the High Court to entertain the anticipatory bail petition first. The matter stands stayed without granting bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8458 of 2022
Applicant :- Pankaj Saini Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 356 lu 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 279] 337] 338] 427] 304&,] Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk ljlkok] ftyk lgkjuiqj esa izsf"kr vkjksi i= fn0 14&11&2021 ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 655 lu 2022] tks lh0ts0,e0] lgkjuiqj ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS rFkk blesa ikfjr izlaKku vkns’k fn0 01&01&2022 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu
fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gS] vkosnd us rFkkdfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS rFkk lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr izlaKku@rych vkns’k ldkj.k ,oa fof/k lEer ugha gS] vkosnd ds fo:) mijksDr /kkjkvksa dk dksbZ vijk/k ugha curk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd og izkFkZuk [k.M esa dh xbZ vU; izkFkZukvksa ij ncko ugha Mkyuk pkgrs gSa] cfYd voj U;k;ky; esa mUekspu izkFkZuk i= nkf[ky djus dh vuqefr pkgrs gSa rFkk muds }kjk nkf[ky fd, x, mUekspu izkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k djus dk] lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ’k fn;k tk;A
eSaus mHk;i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ij fopkj fd;kA
mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ij fopkjksijkUr ,oa vfHkys[k ds voyksdu ls bl Lrj ij ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vkosnd ds f[kykQ mijksDr /kkjkvksa ds vUrxZr dksbZ vijk/k xfBr ugha gksrk gSA vkosnd dh vksj ls tks rdZ izLrqr fd, x, gSa os fookfnr rkfF;d iz’u ls lacaf/kr gSa] ftuds fo"k; esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vkosnu i= ij dksbZ QSlyk nsuk laHko ugha gS] pwWfd mDr rkfF;d iz’uksa dk fofu’p; fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk gh lk{; vkus ds ckn fd;k tk ldrk gSA bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another, (Para10) 2005 SCC (Cri.) 283 esa fn, x, fu.kZ;ksa esa ;g vo/kkfjr fd;k x;k gS fd bl Lrj ij dsoy izFke n`"V;k gh dsl ns[kk tkuk gSA eqyfteku dk tks fookfnr cpko dFku gS ml ij bl Lrj ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= cyghu gS vkSj fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
gkyWkfd vkosnd ;fn pkgs rks lEcfU/kr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k mUekspu izkFkZuk i= nkf[ky dj ldrk gSA ;fn vkosnd }kjk voj U;k;ky; esa mUekspu izkFkZuk i= nkf[ky fd;k tkrk gS rks lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk mHk; i{k dks lqudj] U;k;ksfpr vkns'k ds ek/;e ls mldk fuLrkj.k miyC/k lk{; ds vk/kkj ij izkFkfedrk ds vk/kkj ij 'kh/kzrkiwoZd fd;k tk;A
mDr funsZ'kksa ds lkFk ;g izkFkZuki= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 23&8&2022
ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.08.24 14:05:37 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pankaj Saini
State of U.P.
Another
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
