Allowed

Sudhir and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC23 Aug 2022A482/17671/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court quashed a criminal trial proceeding under Section 482 CrPC following the High Court decision in Satendra Kumar Antil, reiterating that transfers of pending matters prohibit this court from interfering unless no transfer is feasible.

What did the court decide?

The application under Section 482 CrPC was allowed and the impugned judicial proceeding was quashed. The matter was remitted to the High Court.

Sudhir and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 85

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17671 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Sudhir And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajatshatru Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosndx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] QkStnkjh okn la0 4491 lu 2018 esa ,0lh0ts0,e0] dksVZ ua0 1] cqyUn’kgj }kjk ikfjr rych vkns’k fn0 11&12&2019 ,oa QkStnkjh fuxjkuh la0 18 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 452] 323] 504] 506] 307 Hkk0na0fo0 esa ,fM’kuy ls’ku tt] dksVZ ua0 9] cqyUn’kgj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 26&11&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶7

mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks Jo.kksijkUr] i=koyh ds ifj’khyu ls] U;k;ky; us ik;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa yxk, x, vkjksi ,d laKs; vijk/k ds deh’ku dk [kqyklk djrs gSa vkSj og vkjksi] dh x;h foospuk ds mijkUr yxk, x, gSa] mu vkjksiksa dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds rgr viuh 'kfDr dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] tkWp ds nkSjku ,d= dh x;h lkexzh ds vkjksiksa dh 'kq)rk vkSj fo’oluh;rk dk vkdyu djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] bl Lrj ij vfHk;qDr ds fookfnr c;ko ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rnuqlkj vkjksi i= ;k mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks jnn djus dh izkFkZuk vkSj ifj.kkeh dk;Zokgh vLohd`r dh tkrh gSA

¶8

bl Lrj ij] vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd vkosndx.k dks vHkh rd mijksDr ekeys esa fxjQrkj ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj iqfyl vkosndx.k dks fxjQrkj djus ds iz;kl esa gS] vkSj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk vkosndx.k ds f[kykQ n.MkRed izfdz;k tkjh dh tk ldrh gS] blfy, vkosndx.k ds tekur vkosnu i= ij fopkj djus ds fy, lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ’k tkjh dj fn;k tk;A

¶9

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another ( Apecial Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 ds izdj.k dks vkns’k fn0 7&10&2021 }kjk igys gh tekur gsrq fn’kk funsZ’k nsrs gq, fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gS] blds i’pkr~ vc lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks tekur nsus ds fy, muds foosd vkSj fopkj dks fu;af=r djus okys oS/kkfud izkfo/kkuksa dks izHkkfor fd, fcuk] bl U;k;ky; }kjk dksbZ fof’k"V funsZ’k tkjh djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] D;ksafd ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; vkosnd ds tekur izkFkZuk i= dks fuLrkfjr djrs le; ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk igys ls tkjh vko’;d fn’kkfunsZ’kksa dks /;ku esa j[ksxkA

¶10

mijksDr fVIif.k;ksa ds lkFk] ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 23&8&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶11

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.08.23 17:31:24 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sudhir and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Danish Ali Khan Vs State of U.P.and Another

Rakesh Vs State of U.P. and 15 Others

Pawan Kumar Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pankaj Saini Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shiv Shankar Vs State of U.P. and 15 Others

Dr. Mohammad Akmal Vs State of U.P. and Another