mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ij fopkjksijkUr ,oa vfHkys[k ds voyksdu ls bl Lrj ij ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vkosndx.k ds f[kykQ mijksDr /kkjkvksa ds vUrxZr dksbZ vijk/k xfBr ugha gksrk gSA vkosndx.k dh vksj ls tks rdZ izLrqr fd, x, gSa os fookfnr rkfF;d iz’u ls lacaf/kr gSa] ftuds fo"k; esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vkosnu i= ij dksbZ QSlyk nsuk laHko ugha gS] pwWfd mDr rkfF;d iz’uksa dk fofu’p; fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk gh lk{; vkus ds ckn fd;k tk ldrk gSA bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another, (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cri.) 283 esa fn, x, fu.kZ;ksa esa ;g vo/kkfjr fd;k x;k gS fd bl Lrj ij dsoy izFke n`"V;k gh dsl ns[kk tkuk gSA eqyfteku dk tks fookfnr cpko dFku gS ml ij bl Lrj ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= cyghu gS vkSj fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
