The High Court dismissed the application under Section 482 CrPC seeking directions to grant bail. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Satendra Kumar Antil, the Court held that once the Supreme Court takes up a matter, no interim relief is required from the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2002 of 2022
Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Shahi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Aditya Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 458 lu 2017] vUrxZr /kkjk 294] 354 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk dksrokyh] ftyk bVkok esa izsf"kr vkjksi i= fn0 22&5&2018 ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 3612 lu 2018] tks lh0ts0,e0] bVkok ds U;k;ky; e a s yfEcr gS rFkk blesa ikfjr izlaKku vkns’k fn0 19&7&2018 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks Jo.kksijkUr] i=koyh ds ifj’khyu ls] U;k;ky; us ik;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa yxk, x, vkjksi ,d laKs; vijk/k ds deh’ku dk [kqyklk djrs gSa vkSj og vkjksi] dh x;h foospuk ds mijkUr yxk, x, gSa] mu vkjksiksa dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds rgr viuh 'kfDr dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] tkWp ds nkSjku ,d= dh x;h lkexzh ds vkjksiksa dh 'kq)rk vkSj fo’oluh;rk dk vkdyu djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] bl Lrj ij vfHk;qDr ds fookfnr c;ko ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rnuqlkj vkjksi i= ;k mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks jnn djus dh izkFkZuk vkSj ifj.kkeh dk;Zokgh vLohd`r dh tkrh gSA
bl Lrj ij] vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd vkosnd dks vHkh rd mijksDr ekeys esa fxjQrkj ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj iqfyl vkosnd dks fxjQrkj djus ds iz;kl esa gS] vkSj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnd ds f[kykQ n.MkRed izfdz;k tkjh dh tk ldrh gS] blfy, vkosnd ds tekur vkosnu i= ij fopkj djus ds fy, lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ’k tkjh dj fn;k tk;A
ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another ( Apecial Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 ds izdj.k dks vkns’k fn0 7&10&2021 }kjk igys gh tekur gsrq fn’kk funsZ’k nsrs gq, fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gS] blds i’pkr~ vc lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks tekur nsus ds fy, muds foosd vkSj fopkj dks fu;af=r djus okys oS/kkfud izkfo/kkuksa dks izHkkfor fd, fcuk] bl U;k;ky; }kjk dksbZ fof’k"V funsZ’k tkjh djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] D;ksafd ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; vkosnd ds tekur izkFkZuk i= dks fuLrkfjr djrs le; ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk igys ls tkjh vko’;d fn’kkfunsZ’kksa dks /;ku esa j[ksxkA
mijksDr fVIif.k;ksa ds lkFk] ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 13&7&2022 ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.07.13 16:52:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court is required to initiate proceedings for granting bail when the Supreme Court has taken up the matter for consideration.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherFollowed¶9
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021)
Vinay Kumar Shahi
State of U.P.
Another
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
