Allowed

Shahrukh v. State of U.P Thru Secretary Home Lknw. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Jul 2022A482/2182/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge allowed the applicant's application under Section 482 CrPC to quash a High Court order that had quashed a summons. The court found the impugned order was mechanically passed without a judicial mind, suffered from pendency, and caused collateral inhibition.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of the impugned order dated 15-12-2021 and direction to the High Court to decide whether the proceedings are at all maintainable.

Shahrukh Vs State of U.P Thru Secretary Home… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 83

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2182 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Shahrukh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru Secretary Home Lknw. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Belal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sachchida Nand Tiwari

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] ,l0Vh0 ua0 329 lu 2020 esa ,fM’kuy fMfLVzDV ,.M ls’kUl tt@ Lis’ky tt] ikDlks ,sDV] gkiqM+ }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 15&12&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ,oa rF;ksa ij vk/kkfjr ugha gS] blfy, iz’uxr vkns’k =qfViw.kZ gS ,oa vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gaS

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us muds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k fd;k rFkk dgk fd ?kVuk ds le; dfFkr ihfM+rk ukckfyx Fkh ,oa fjiksVZ fy[kkus ds le; og ckfyx gks x;h Fkh blfy, fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns’k mfpr gS] mlesa gLr{ksi djus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA

¶9

eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa iz’uxr vkns’kksa dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶10

fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ij vk/kkfjr gS] ldkj.k ,oa mfpr vkns’k gS] mlesa dksbZ lkjoku vfu;ferrk] vukSfpR;rk ;k izfdz;k ;k {ks=kf/kdkj laca/kh =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gSA vr% iz’uxr vkns’k dks vikLr djus lacaf/kr vkosnd dh izkFkZuk fujLr fd, tkus rFkk iz'uxr vkns'k iq"V fd, tkus ;ksX; gSaA

¶11

rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ,l0Vh0 ua0 329 lu 2020 esa ,fM’kuy fMfLVzDV ,.M ls’kUl tt@ Lis’ky tt] ikDlks ,sDV] gkiqM+ }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 15&12&2021 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA

¶12

dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr fd;k tk;A

¶13

fn0 % 12&7&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶14

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.07.13 14:00:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shahrukh v. State of U.P Thru Secretary Home Lknw. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahrukh v. State of U.P Thru Secretary Home Lknw. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Altamish @ Altasim Vs State of Up and Another

Sanjeev Nagar Vs State of U.P and Another

Sunita Jha and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Bhola Nath Shukla Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Sandeep Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish Varma and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another