Mayank Bana v. State of U.P.and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge transfer order in S. 482 Application denying revised opinion to remand the applicant in custody after he had been granted bail by the Single Judge.
What did the court decide?
Application transferred to a larger Bench for further consideration; no stay, remand, or quashing by this bench.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3303 of 2022
Applicant :- Mayank Bana Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Satyam Narayan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 48 lu 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 498,] 323] 406 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk gkfQtiqj] ftyk gkiqM+ esa izsf"kr vkjksi i= fn0 20&4&2021 ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 355 lu 2021] tks U;kf;d eftLVzsV lsdsUM] gkiqM+ ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh lR;e ukjk;.k] foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh eksgEen csyky ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks Jo.kksijkUr] i=koyh ds ifj’khyu ls] U;k;ky; us ik;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa yxk, x, vkjksi ,d laKs; vijk/k ds deh’ku dk [kqyklk djrs gSa vkSj og vkjksi] dh x;h foospuk ds mijkUr yxk, x, gSa] mu vkjksiksa dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds rgr viuh 'kfDr dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] tkWp ds nkSjku ,d= dh x;h lkexzh ds vkjksiksa dh 'kq)rk vkSj fo’oluh;rk dk vkdyu djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] bl Lrj ij vfHk;qDr ds fookfnr cpko ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rnuqlkj vkjksi i= ;k mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks jnn djus dh izkFkZuk vkSj ifj.kkeh dk;Zokgh vLohd`r dh tkrh gSA
bl Lrj ij] vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd vkosnd dks vHkh rd mijksDr ekeys esa fxjQrkj ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj iqfyl vkosnd dks fxjQrkj djus ds iz;kl esa gS] vkSj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnd ds f[kykQ n.MkRed izfdz;k tkjh dh tk ldrh gS] blfy, vkosnd ds tekur vkosnu i= ij fopkj djus ds fy, lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ’k tkjh dj fn;k tk;A
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a remand order that affirmed the applicant's bail application could be set aside under Section 482 CrPC.
Whether Section 482 CrPC provides a stay to triable courts to ensure jurisdiction for bail matters.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mayank Bana
Coram
Gautam Chowdhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/3303/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court