Criminal applicant challenged the remand order and sought quashing of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. holding that prima facie case, remand is valid, and trial should proceed.
Application dismissed; impugned order setting aside trial remanded; fresh investigation directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3241 of 2022
Applicant :- Mohd. Imran Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Murtuza Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
/kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 28 lu 2013] vUrxZr /kkjk 419] 420 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk xksihxat] ftyk lUr jfonkluxj] Hknksgh ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 922 lu 2013 esa lh0ts0,e0 Hknksgh] Kkuiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 13&3&2020 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dh vksj ls fo}ku voj U;k;ky; esa mUekspu izkFkZuk i= bl vk/kkj ij izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk fd oknh eqdnek Fkkuk xksihxat ds Fkkuk/;{k Fks] ftUgksaus lkft’ku in dk nq:i;ksx dj xyr rjhds ls >wBs eqdnesa esa Qwlk;k gS rFkk Fkkuk xksihxat dh iqfyl us gh foospuk dj xyr <ax ls izkFkhZ ds f[kykQ vkjksi i= izsf"kr fd;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd fo}ku voj U;k;ky; us vkosnd }kjk izLrqr fd, x, lk{;ksa ij fcuk dksbZ leqfpr fopkj fd, gq,] ljljh rkSj ij mls fujLr fd;k gS] blfy, iz’uxr vkns’k vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us bldk izcy fojks/k fd;kA
eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa iz’uxr vkns’k dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ij vk/kkfjr gS] ldkj.k vkns’k gSa rFkk lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k mfpr gSa] mlesa dksbZ lkjoku vfu;ferrk ;k vukSfpR;rk ;k dksbZ izfdz;k ;k {ks=kf/kdkj laca/kh =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gSA vr% iz’uxr vkns’k dks vikLr djus lacaf/kr vkosnd dh izkFkZuk fujLr fd, tkus rFkk iz'uxr vkns'k iq"V fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk mijksDr okn esa voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k fn0 13&3&2020 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA
dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr fd;k tk;A
fn0 % 11&2&2022 ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.02.11 17:25:36 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order of remand to police investigation is maintainable under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Whether High Court should quash the trial when investigation is still pending by police.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohd. Imran
Mohd. Imran
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
