Allowed

Urmila Devi v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Allahabad HC11 Feb 2022A482/3292/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Judge Gautam Chowdhary allowed the applicant's application under Section 482 CrPC, setting aside the order not to quash Section 156(3) CrPC proceedings due to police inaction, directing the court to issue fresh summons under Section 4(2) of the Juvenile Justice Act 2015..

What did the court decide?

The impugned order not to quash was set aside. Fresh summons were directed to remind the police of their statutory duty under the Juvenile Justice Act to record the statement.

Urmila Devi Vs State of U.P. and 7… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 49

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3292 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Urmila Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Dubey,Manoj Singh Rathaur Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosfndk dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] okn la0 356 lu 2021] mfeZyk nsoh olsZl dqUMy frokjh vkfn] tks /kkjk 156(3) na0iz0la0 ds vkosnu i= ls mn~Hkwr gqvk gS rFkk ftls ifjokn ds :i esa ntZ fd;k x;k gS] esa ,fM’kuy ls’ku tt@ Lis’ky tt] ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV] xksj[kiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 14&9&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosfndk }kjk fo}ku voj U;k;ky; esa /kkjk 156(3) na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr vkosnui= izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk] ftls fo}ku ,fM’kuy ls’ku tt@ Lis’ky tt] ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV] xksj[kiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 14&9&2021 }kjk ifjokn ds :i esa iathd`r fd;k x;k rFkk /kkjk 200 na0iz0la0 ds c;ku gsrq frfFk fu;r dj nh x;h] tcfd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks ,slh ?kVukvksa dh foospuk djus gsrq fopkj djuk pkfg, Fkk vkSj lacaf/kr Fkkus esa izkFkfedh ntZ djds ekeys dh tkWp djkus dk vkns’k ikfjr djuk pkfg, Fkk] fdUrq fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ,slk ugha fd;k x;k] bl izdkj iz’uxr vkns’k =qfViw.kZ gS rFkk vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶8

eSaus vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds leFkZu esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa iz’uxr vkns’k dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶9

rnuqlkj /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr nk;j ;g vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk mijksDr okn esa voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k fn0 14&9&2021 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS] ,oa izdj.k dks muds le{k bl funsZ’k ds lkFk izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gS fd izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k vuqlwfpr tkfr vkSj vuqlwfpr tutkfr (vR;kpkj fuokj.k) vf/kfu;e] 1989 dh /kkjk 4] tks fuEuor gS] ds izdk’k esa fd;k tk;A

¶10

“[ 4& drZO; mis{kk ds fy, naM& (1) dksbZ Hkh yksd lsod] tks vuqlwfpr tkfr ;k vuqlwfpr tutkfr dk lnL; ugha gS] bl vf/kfu;e vkSj mlds v/khu cuk, x, fu;eksa ds v/khu mlds }kjk ikyu fd, tkus ds fy, visf{kr vius drZO;ksa dh tkucw>dj mis{kk djsxk] og dkjkokl ls] ftldh vof/k Ng ekl ls de dh ugha gksxh] fdarq tks ,d o"kZ rd dh gks ldsxh] naMuh; gksxkA

¶11

(2) mi/kkjk (1) esa fufnZ"V yksd lsod ds drZO;ksa esa fuEufyf[kr lfEefyr gksxk]&

¶12

(d) iqfyl Fkkus ds izHkkjh vf/kdkjh }kjk lwpukdrkZ ds gLrk{kj ysus ls igys ekSf[kd

¶13

:i ls nh xbZ lwpuk dks] lwpukdrkZ dks i<+dj lqukuk vkSj mldks ys[kc) djuk;

¶14

([k) bl vf/kfu;e vkSj vU; lqlaxr mica/kksa ds v/khu f’kdk;r ;k izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks jftLVj djuk vkSj vf/kfu;e dh mi;qDr /kkjkvksa ds v/khu mldks jftLVj djuk;

¶15

(x) bl izdkj vfHkfyf[kr dh xbZ lwpuk dh ,d izfr lwpukdrkZ dks rqjar iznku djuk; (?k) ihfM+rksa ;k lkf{k;ksa ds dFku dks vfHkfyf[kr djuk;

¶16

( M- ) vUos"k.k djuk vkSj fo’ks"k U;k;ky; ;k vuU; fo’ks"k U;k;ky; esa lkB fnu dh vof/k

¶17

ds Hkhrj vkjksii= Qkby djuk rFkk foyac] ;fn dksbZ] gks] fyf[kr esa Li"V djuk ;

¶18

(p) fdlh nLrkost ;k bysDVzkfud vfHkys[k dks lgh :i ls rS;kj] fojfpr djuk rFkk

¶19

mldk vuqokn djuk;

¶20

(N) bl vf/kfu;e ;k mlds v/khu cuk, x, fu;eksa esa fofufnZ"V fdlh vU; drZO; dk ikyu djuk :

¶21

ijarq yksd lsod ds fo:) bl laca/k esa vkjksi] iz’kklfud tkap dh flQkfj’k ij vfHkfyf[kr fd, tk,axsA

¶22

(3) yksd lsod }kjk mi/kkjk (2) esa fufnZ"V drZO; dh vogsyuk ds laca/k esa laKku fo’ks"k U;k;ky; ;k vuU; fo’ks"k U;k;ky; }kjk fy;k tk,xk vkSj yksd lsod ds fo:) nkafMd dkjZokb;ksa ds fy, funs’k fn;k tk,xkA]”

¶23

dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsA

fn0 % 11&2&2022

ds0lh0flag

2 of 2

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.02.15 14:45:03 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Urmila Devi v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Urmila Devi v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sunil Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vivek Verma and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Imran Vs State of Up and Another

Mayank Bana Vs State of U.P.and Another

Ratan Jaiswal Vs State of U.P. and Others