Disposed

Manish @ Mohneesh Mangetar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC9 Sept 2022A482/23714/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought quashing of proceedings under Section 482 CrPC. Court directed trial court to decide bail application based on law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil judgments if applicants appear within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction given to trial court to decide bail application based on Satender Kumar Antil law if applicants appear within three weeks.

Manish @ Mohneesh Mangetar and 2 Others Vs State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 87

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23714 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Manish @ Mohneesh Mangetar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, Dr. S.B.Maurya, learned AGAI, for the State, and perused the record of the case.

¶6

By way of the present application, the applicants have made a prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Case No.6259 of 2020 arising out of Case Crime No. 07 of 2020, under Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Etah, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Etah and as well as charge sheet dated 29.5.2020 and cognizance order dated 25.3.2022.

¶7

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the prayer made in the application. He confines his prayer only to the extent that a direction be given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicants in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Breau of Investigation, reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773 and Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Breau of Investigation and others, MANU/SC/0851/2022.

¶8

Learned AGA is having no objection, if such a direction is given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicants in the light

¶9

of the judgments of the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supras).

¶10

Accordingly, it is directed that if applicants appear before the trial court within three weeks from today and move bail application then their bail application shall be decided by the court below on the basis of law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supras).

¶11

With these direction/observation, the present application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 9.9.2022 SKM

¶13

Digitally signed by SHRAVANA KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2022.09.29 12:33:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manish @ Mohneesh Mangetar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish @ Mohneesh Mangetar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar and Others Vs State of U.P. and Others

Jahid @ Javed Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jaipal Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vijay Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dhirendra Gopal Awasthi and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ajeem Vs State of U.P.