Lav Kush @ Deepu and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application under Section 482 CrPC arising from a matrimonial dispute, the applicant alleged a compromise was reached. The High Court, noting the opposite party's absence, disposed of the application by directing the trial court to verify the compromise agreement expeditiously in the presence of all parties.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the trial Court to verify the compromise agreement expeditiously in the presence of parties.