The application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous due to a subsequent event. No substantive reasoning or legal issues were addressed in the brief order signed by the single-judge bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16678 of 2022
Applicant :- Bharat Kumar Yadav And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Lalit Kumar,Kamalesh Kumar Nishad
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Sri Kamlesh Kumar Nishad, learned counsel for applicants, on instructions, submits that this application has become infructuous due to subsequent event.
In view of above, the application stands dismissed as rendered infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.9.2022 Nirmal Sinha
(Sl.No. 29 out of 290 fresh cases)
Digitally signed by NIRMAL SINHA Date: 2022.09.16 15:36:22 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Bharat Kumar Yadav And 2 Others
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Nirmal Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
