K.C. Bakhshi v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution by the applicant who failed to appear despite a revised call. Any interim order was vacated.
The court dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution by the applicant who failed to appear despite a revised call. Any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1267 of 2001
Applicant :- K.C. Bakhshi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Khanna,Taha Bin Islam Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
None present on behalf of applicant even in revised call.
Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 11.10.2022 SB
Digitally signed by SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA Date: 2022.10.12 17:52:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
K.C. Bakhshi
State of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court