In a criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., the court, noting the absence of the revisionist, perused the record. Finding no manifest error or illegality, the court dismissed the revision and vacated any interim order.
The criminal revision was dismissed and the interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 346 of 2002
Revisionist :- Siya Ram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- A.K. Sachan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 10.10.2022 Nirmal Sinha
Digitally signed by NIRMAL SINHA Date: 2022.10.21 14:44:52 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the criminal revision filed under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. against the conviction and sentencing order.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Siya Ram
State of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Nirmal Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
