Sudhakar Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as no advocate appeared on behalf of the applicant even upon revised call.
The application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as no advocate appeared on behalf of the applicant even upon revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11548 of 2007
Applicant :- Sudhakar Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dr. Arun Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 22.9.2022 AK
Digitally signed by AWADESH KUMAR Date: 2022.09.22 18:20:46 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudhakar Sharma
State of U.P.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
AWADESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court