The criminal revision was dismissed, and any interim order was vacated. The High Court found no manifest error or illegality in the conviction and sentence of the revisionist under Section 411 IPC.
The criminal revision is dismissed. Any interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 926 of 2003
Revisionist :- Dhani Ram @ Dhanpal Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- A.R. Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 21.9.2022 SB
Digitally signed by SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA Date: 2022.09.22 17:49:53 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
whether to permit interference in the criminal revision as there is no manifest error or illegality
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhani Ram @ Dhanpal Singh
State of U.P.
Another
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
