Disposed

Akbar Ali and 18 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC4 May 2022A482/11098/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition wherein the Applicants sought liberty to file a bail application before the trial court within fifteen days and a subsequent decision within ten days, relying on Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Granted liberty to file bail application within fifteen days; trial court to decide within ten days thereafter.

Akbar Ali and 18 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 92

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11098 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Akbar Ali And 18 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Tewari,Braham Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶5

Instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the applicants/petitioners for quashing of the impugned charge-sheet no. 72 of 2019 dated 27.07.2021 in case crime no. 407 of 2018, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 153A, 295, 323, 504, 506, 352 IPC, Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) & 3(2)(v)a of SC/ST Act, Police Station Bhojpur, District Moradabad as well as proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No. 706 of 2021 pending in the court of learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Moradabad.

¶6

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners has submitted that he does not want to press the petition and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in order dated 7.10.2021 passed in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another .

¶7

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners.

¶8

On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicants/petitioners move bail application before the trial court within fifteen days' from today, the same shall be decided within a period of ten days thereafter, in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (supra).

¶9

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶10

Order Date :- 4.5.2022 Nitesh

¶11

Digitally signed by NITESH KUMAR TEWARY Date: 2022.05.04 16:21:18 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Akbar Ali and 18 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akbar Ali and 18 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Afsar Ali and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vipin Yadav Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and another

Parvez Ahmad and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sumit Arora and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shreeniwas Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dheeraj Bajpayee and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another