In this quashing application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court did not quash the proceedings. Instead, it directed the applicants to move for bail before the trial court within 15 days, citing relevant precedents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10672 of 2022
Applicant :- Netrapal And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjive Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash Tripathi,J.
Order Date :- 2.8.2022 Priya
Digitally signed by PRIYA KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.08.03 10:05:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherExplained¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
Brahm Singh and others vs. State of UP and othersExplained¶8
Brahm Singh and others vs. State of UP and others, 2016 (95) ACC 950
Netrapal
Om Prakash Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
