Petition dismissed as infructuous after FIR registered in compliance of impugned orders, rendering the Article 227 writ petition no longer necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 90
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1130 of 2022
Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ran Vijay Singh,Shailendra Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
Learned counsel for petitioners prays to withdraw this petition as the F.I.R. has been registered in compliance of the impugned order so petition has become infructuous.
The F.I.R. has been shown by learned A.G.A.
As per the facts placed before this Court, the petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed being infructuous.
Order Date :- 4.3.2022 SY
Digitally signed by SWETA YADAV Date: 2022.03.05 15:45:17 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jitendra Kumar And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Sadhna Rani (Thakur) Thakur
Sweta Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
