Neetu Devi v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on the ground that the corpus had been recovered. The court disposed of the matter without a detailed analysis.
This writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on the ground that the corpus had been recovered. The court disposed of the matter without a detailed analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 90
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 146 of 2020
Petitioner :- Neetu Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Phool Singh Yadav
Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the corpus has been recovered, this petition has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 3.3.2022 Gss
Digitally signed by GIRAJA SHANKER SHARMA Date: 2022.03.03 16:24:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Neetu Devi
State Of U.P.
Sadhna Rani Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court