The court dismissed the Article 227 petition challenging orders passed by the District Magistrate and Commercial Court, Bareilly, finding no perversity or patent illegality in the lower courts' findings of fact.
The petition is dismissed as there is no perversity or patent illegality in the orders of the courts below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1125 of 2022
Petitioner :- District Urban Development Agency Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhinav Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
The present petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 17.02.2018 and 12.02.2021 passed by the District Magistrate, Bareilly and the Commercial Court, District-Bareilly, respectively.
The orders have been passed after considering the relevant facts and material available on record. The findings of the courts below are findings of the facts. There is no perversity or patent illegality in the orders.
The petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 7.3.2022 SY
Digitally signed by SWETA YADAV Date: 2022.03.07 16:46:05 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
District Urban Development Agency
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
