The High Court condensed a delayed criminal revision challenging a maintenance order. The revision was disposed of as affixed, with the petitioners permitted to file separate proceedings for enhancement of maintenance.
Condonation of delay and disposal of revision; permission to file separate proceedings for enhancement of maintenance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 979 of 2015
Revisionist :- Smt. Sushila Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Brihaspati Mani Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Amit Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 29.7.2022 MVS/-
Digitally signed by MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN Date: 2022.07.29 18:53:24 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone the significant delay in filing the criminal revision.
Whether to interfere with the order regarding the award of maintenance and its deduction from other maintenance amounts.
Smt. Sushila Devi and another
State of U.P. and another
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Manoj Vikram Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
